What I do, and how I do it.
Every engagement starts with the same question: what decision are you trying to make? The analysis follows from there — not the other way around.
Workforce Prediction Models
Predictive modeling for the outcomes that matter most — turnover, performance, promotion readiness, engagement risk. I build models trained on your data, validated rigorously, and designed to produce actionable outputs rather than just interesting statistics.
This might look like:
- A turnover risk score for each employee, updated monthly, with the key drivers surfaced
- A performance classification model for hiring decisions in high-volume roles
- A promotion-readiness index built from behavioral observations and assessment data
- A quantified estimate of how much your current selection process is costing you
I work in R and Python. I build models people can actually understand and use — not black boxes.
Measurement Design
Most organizations try to measure HR outcomes without first asking whether their instruments actually measure what they think they do. I help you define what you want to measure, build or select instruments that measure it, and validate that they work.
This might look like:
- Defining a construct (e.g., "high potential") rigorously enough that it can actually be measured
- Auditing existing metrics to assess whether they measure what you claim
- Building a measurement framework that connects people data to business outcomes
- Applying decomposition and Fermi estimation to quantities you thought were unmeasurable
Decision Analysis
Some HR questions don't need more data — they need better decision framing. I apply decision analysis techniques to help leaders think clearly about high-stakes people decisions under uncertainty.
This might look like:
- Quantifying the value of information — is it worth running that survey or assessment before deciding?
- Modeling the distribution of outcomes for a restructuring or workforce change
- Calibration workshops to improve how your team estimates and reasons under uncertainty
- Building a decision model for a make/buy/develop talent question
Grounded in the work of Howard Raiffa, Ron Howard, and Douglas Hubbard.
Survey & Assessment Design
Rigorously designed employee surveys and selection assessments — built on psychometric principles, not intuition and convenience. If you're going to ask people questions and act on the answers, the questions should be worth asking.
This might look like:
- Employee engagement or culture surveys designed with construct validity in mind
- Selection instruments developed and validated against job performance criteria
- Post-survey analysis that goes beyond means to model drivers of key outcomes
- Assessment audits — evaluating whether your current tools predict what you think they predict
How engagements work
I'm a solo practitioner. Engagements are project-based, scoped in advance, and you work directly with me throughout. I'm not a fit for every situation — I'm a fit when you want rigorous analysis, honest assessment of uncertainty, and a collaborator who will push back on the question before accepting it.
Engagements typically begin with a scoping call. If there's a fit, I'll propose a defined scope, timeline, and fee. No retainer requirements, no minimum spend.